Showing posts with label Liberal Hypocrisy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liberal Hypocrisy. Show all posts

Friday, March 9, 2012

Video- ShePAC Ad: Bill Maher: Obama's Million Dollar Man

By Susan Duclos

ShePAC, Support. Honor. Elect.

Via TheBlaze:

There’s a scathing new video out hitting the “double standard” of comedian Bill Maher’s $1 million donation in support of President Barack Obama’s re-election, which he made just weeks before Obama publicly scolded Rush Limbaugh for calling a Georgetown Law student a “slut.”

The context, of course, is that Maher has made numerous misogynist slurs over the years, including calling former Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin a “c–t.”

Watch the video below, via political action committee ShePAC:




Related: Since we are talking about pigs here, Greta Van Susteren has a message:

Another pig….and a media association has hired the pig, Louis C.K., to be their headliner for the big media dinner? Really? I am not going. I refuse to go. Everyone in the media should join me in this boycott.

The headliner of this year’s Radio and Television Correspondents Dinner is “comedian” Louis C.K. Comedian? I don’t think so. Pig? yes.

He uses filthy language about women…..yes, the C word…and yes, even to describe a woman candidate for Vice President of the United States. It isn’t just Governor Palin he denigrates. He denigrates all women and looks to the crowd to laugh.


Van Susteran provides specific examples as well, so head over and read all about it.

[Update] Louis C.K. drops out. PowerLine points out that by creating such a furor over Rush Limbaugh's slut remarks about Sandra Fluke, they may have miscalculated because of the extensive list of examples of liberal personalities that are now fair game for their continued use of derogatory terms in referring to conservative women.

.

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Rush Limbaugh: 'Clearing Up Misinformation on Our Sponsors'

By Susan Duclos

Make a statement: Advertise on the Rush Limbaugh Show

RushAdvertising@Premrad.com


Rush Limbaugh explained yesterday how sponsorship works and why the hype over his show losing sponsors makes for good headlines but doesn't hurt him one iota.

Limbaugh transcript, 3/7/12:

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: I want to ask if you will indulge me for just a brief few minutes for some inside baseball stuff before we move on to our review of the issues of the day, politics and so forth, Super Tuesday, the results, and where we are. The reason for this is, once again, so much misinformation about this program and advertisers is in the mainstream media. People are reporting things that, A, are not true, and B, I don't even think the people reporting it have the slightest idea what they're talking about, nor do they have the ability to understand it.

But I know that many of you are spending a lot of time -- God bless you -- on the Web doing what you can to express your support for the program. And judging from the reaction of my own brother, who sends me a note last night, "You really lost 28 sponsors?" No, we have not lost 28 sponsors. "Well, how can they say it?" Because they lie and because they don't understand how it works, and that's what I want to try and explain. In fact, folks, we have three brand-new sponsors that will be starting in the next two weeks. Now, obviously, I'm not gonna tell you who they are today, but we've got three brand-new, full-fledged sponsors starting in the next two weeks.


Two of the sponsors who have canceled have asked to return. We are being very careful about that. Not gonna give you any names here. One of them is practically begging to come back. Everything is fine on the business side. Everything's cool. There is not a thing to worry about. What you're seeing on television about this program and sponsors and advertisers is just incorrect. And let me try to explain how this works. Let's take the claim that we've lost 28 sponsors. Sponsors on this program are both local and national. We deal with the national sponsors on this program. We have 600-plus stations. They sell their own commercials. We don't have anything to do with those sponsors. We don't get paid by those sponsors. We have no idea who those sponsors are.

Let's make up a company, ABC Widget Company. And let's say that ABC Widget Company says, "We are no longer going to appear on the Rush Limbaugh Show." Well, ABC Widget Company isn't on the Rush Limbaugh Show. What happens is, advertising agencies order advertising buys on a series of local stations from market to market to market. A controversy like this erupts. They put out a notice to the stations, "By the way, for the time being we don't want our commercials run when Limbaugh is on." But they are not canceling their advertising on the station. They're just saying they don't want it running on my program during the local affiliate's commercial time, not ours.

So this 28 or 32 -- and I don't even know if that number's accurate, numbers are coming from Media Matters. There's no way anybody could know this, but I'm gonna put it in further perspective in just a second. What it means is there have been -- let's use the number 28 -- 28 advertisers who none of us are aware are even advertising on our local stations who had sent out orders that their commercials are not to run on my program. But that is not revenue to us. They are not our sponsors. They are not even canceling their advertising on the local station. They're just saying for the time being they don't want it run from noon to three. And let me tell you, this happens every day. It's been happening for 23-plus years. And it's not just to me. There are clients, advertisers, that tell stations, "I don't want this to run in Beck's show. I don't want it to run in Hannity's. I don't want it to run in Howard Stern's." It's all part of the business.

But because there's a focal point on this in trying to dispirit you and trying to present a picture of this program that doesn't exist and that's untrue, they're trying to make it sound like this is unprecedented -- that it's never happened before, it's at an all-time high -- and it simply isn't the case. We have not lost 28 national sponsors. There are not 28 advertisers who were paying us who aren't anymore. They are local commercial buys. Many of them may not even be running in my show to begin with. The advertisers are just saying, "If they are, pull 'em. We don't want 'em in there for now," but they're staying on the local stations. These advertisers are not abandoning EIB affiliates.

Nobody is losing money here, including us, in all this. And that is key for you to understand. They are not canceling the business on our stations. They're just saying they don't want their spots to appear in my show. We don't get any revenue from 'em anyway. The whole effort is to dispirit you. It's to make you think the left is being successful in its campaign when it isn't. In fact, the left is so fed up, they can't see straight. They thought they had me. They thought I would be off the air by now. They can't understand why I still am on the air. There is also another rumor going around that I am going to be suspended for a week. It is utter BS.

I would have to suspend myself!

Now, let me put this in further perspective for you, this number of 28 or 32, and then we're gonna move on to other things. Sponsors of our program are both nationwide companies, like Two If By Tea (my tea company), and local companies, like "Mike's Auto Body Repair" or a local bank. If we added up all of our affiliates (let's choose the number 600) and we assumed that each of those affiliates had 30 such sponsors in the course of our three-hour program, there might be -- all across this country -- as many as 18,000 different sponsors of this program. Let me put it another way: There might be 18,000 different people buying advertising within this program alone.

That is a conservative number: 600 stations, 18 commercial minutes an hour. We take whatever we take to sell ourselves and the local station keeps the rest. They have local advertisers. You add up all those over the course of 600 stations, over three hours a day, five days a week, and we're talking 18,000 different sponsors, okay? ABC News, who understands how this works and are purposely misrepresenting it, is out there ballyhooing that we have lost 28 sponsors. Twenty-eight sponsors out of 18,000! That's like losing a couple of french fries in the container when it's delivered to you at the drive-thru. You don't even notice it. If we lose 28 of those sponsors, the majority of them being in one city or another out of 18 thousand, it's a sad occurrence.

But, folks, I would venture to say that this happens every day anyway in the course of doing business. Advertisers come and go. New businesses start up; they start advertising. Some businesses go under, they stop their advertising. None of what's happening is out of the ordinary. It's just part of an onslaught to try to convince you that this show's history and our days are numbered. And I'm happy to tell you nothing could be further from the truth. The point is we have tens of thousands of companies who advertise in this program. We're appreciative of all of them. The vast majority, we don't even know. They are local sponsors.

As I say, we're going to be debuting three (and maybe more) new sponsors in the coming days and weeks. And I'm sure that our affiliate stations are going to be replacing advertisers with new ones. It's the cycle. Nothing stays the same. It's all dynamic; nothing is static. All you need to know is there are no losses. There is only growth. There are only gains; we're moving forward. There is good in everything that happens. You look for it, you find it, you build on it, and you expand it. They have not taken this program out. They have not taken me out. They're the ones who are frustrated. They're the ones who are angry. They're the ones who are gonna be blowing gaskets in the next couple of weeks. I hope I've made this clear.

It's such inside baseball stuff, but 28 sponsors -- 32, whatever number they're using -- that have been lost, are not direct advertisers here. And they may not even be advertising within my three hours on the stations they're running. It's impossible to know. Now, you might say, "Well, whatever it is, these people are putting out statements." Yes, they're putting out statements because they're hoping to make political gains -- and it's gonna backfire. You can look at the stock price of some of these companies. I'm not gonna say any more, but it's going to backfire. So you have a bank say (pompously), "We are announcing today that none of our commercials will ever again run on the Rush Limbaugh Show." They're not a sponsor of ours, folks. They may buy sponsorships on 10 or 15 of our affiliates around country, but they're not sure they're being inserted in my three hours; they want to make sure they're not. They'll run elsewhere on the station.

END TRANSCRIPT



The Right Scoop has the full video of the segment.



Related:

Video- Sarah Palin On Rush Limbaugh

Limbaugh Called Fluke A Slut, Now It's A Big Deal: Did Obama Call Malkin Or Ingraham or Palin?

Rush Apologizes, Will Sandra Fluke Apologize For Expecting Americans To Pay For Her Sex Habit?

Sandra Fluke: When Activism Backfires As Rush Limbaugh Becomes Center of Attention

Eyes Back On The Ball: Obama's Abortion Mandate, Cardinal Dolan And Confusion


.

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Video: Sarah Palin On Rush Limbaugh

By Susan Duclos

Sarah Palin added her two cents in on the ongoing Rush Limbaugh, Sandra Fluke, "slut" controversy.

Palin: "I think the definition of hypocrisy is for Rush Limbaugh to have been called out, forced to apologize and retract what it is that he said in exercising his First Amendment rights and never is that the same applied to the leftist radicals who say such horrible things about the handicapped, about women, about the defenseless. So I think that’s the definition of hypocrisy, and that’s my two cents for you."

Video below:




Other updates on this: The Daily Caller talking about something we wrote about yesterday, Carbonite, who pulled their advertising from Limbaugh's show but never pulled their advertising from shows where liberal media personalities called a conservative woman "right-wing" sluts, has seen on of the largest decliners on the NASDAQ on Tuesday.

Bill Maher defends Rush Limbaugh. Not surprising since Maher himself has been known to call conservative women bimbos and twats. So, whatever.



Dan Riehl at Breitbart.com reports "EXCLUSIVE: DEMS INCITE DEATH THREATS AGAINST LIMBAUGH."


Related:

Limbaugh Called Fluke A Slut, Now It's A Big Deal: Did Obama Call Malkin Or Ingraham or Palin?

Rush Apologizes, Will Sandra Fluke Apologize For Expecting Americans To Pay For Her Sex Habit?

Sandra Fluke: When Activism Backfires As Rush Limbaugh Becomes Center of Attention

Eyes Back On The Ball: Obama's Abortion Mandate, Cardinal Dolan And Confusion

Rush Still Tops News, Liberal Radio Host Mocks Storm Victims As 'Grease Spots' And Silence On Left

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

Carb Stock Watch- Carbonite Suffering For Double Standard Stance?

By Susan Duclos

Via PJ Tatler:

Carbonite led the advertiser exodus from Rush Limbaugh’s show. The Democrat-owned company continues to advertise on Ed Schultz’s show, despite the fact the Schultz is guilty of a thought crime nearly identical to Rush’s: Schultz called Laura Ingraham a “slut” on the air, and later apologized for it. As I argued on America’s Radio News on Monday, the only real difference between what Rush did and what Schultz did is the politics, since both Ingraham and Sandra Fluke are public figures. Schultz hit from the left, Rush hit from the right, but Carbonite has only canceled on Rush. Why?


Carbonite Stock Watch- According to Market Watch, Carbonite is now at 52- week low.

Screen shot, March 6, 2012


Since we are discussing Carbonite's double standards, head over and check out Legal Insurrection's "Announcing The Carbonite Accountability Project", piece.

Liberals might have pushed Carbonite to drop Rush Limbaugh's from their advertising, but it seems conservatives not happy about Carb's double standards are hitting their wallets.

[Update] The Daily Caller reports on the Investors fleeing Carbonite after they dropped Rush: "It was also one of the biggest decliners on the NASDAQ on Tuesday."


Related:

Limbaugh Called Fluke A Slut, Now It's A Big Deal: Did Obama Call Malkin Or Ingraham or Palin?

Rush Apologizes, Will Sandra Fluke Apologize For Expecting Americans To Pay For Her Sex Habit?

Sandra Fluke: When Activism Backfires As Rush Limbaugh Becomes Center of Attention

Eyes Back On The Ball: Obama's Abortion Mandate, Cardinal Dolan And Confusion

Rush Still Tops News, Liberal Radio Host Mocks Storm Victims As 'Grease Spots' And Silence On Left


.

Monday, March 5, 2012

Rush Still Tops News, Liberal Radio Host Mocks Storm Victims As 'Grease Spots' And Silence On Left

By Susan Duclos

I spoke about the hypocrisy on the left for screeching in outrage when Rush Limbaugh called a female liberal activist by the name of Sandra Fluke, a slut, after the majority of liberals ignored liberal personalities calling conservative women twats, cunts, right wing sluts etc... and now we see that same hypocrisy highlighted easily enough as Rush Limbaugh is still topping the political news, even after his apology and Mike Malloy, a liberal talk show host mocks storm victims and liberals are completely silent.

"Their God … keeps smashing them into little grease spots on the pavement in Alabama, and Mississippi, and Arkansas, and Georgia, and Oklahoma,” Malloy says in his broadcast from Friday. “You know, the Bible belt, where [in a mocking voice] they ain’t gonna let no goddamned science get in the way, it says in the Bible, blah blah blah blah blah. So, according to their way of thinking, God with his omnipotent thumb reaches down here and so far tonight has smashed about 20 people into a grease spot on highway 12, or whatever the hell highway they live next to."--- Mike Malloy, March 2, 2012

Audio below:



Let's look again at the Memeorandum screen shot of reactions, first the ongoing outrage over Limbaugh's comments close to a week later.

Screen shots of Memeorandum, March 5, 2012, 2:00 PM:

#1



#2



#3



That was the ongoing bruhaha because Limbaugh, a conservative radio host, called a liberal activist a slut to which he has now apologized.

Now, the reaction over a liberal talk show host mocking states ravaged by storms where people have lost their homes and died.


Screen shot of Memeorandum, March 5, 2012, 5:15 PM



Yep, that is it.

People are dead, homes destroyed, businesses ruined whole towns are devastated and Malloy mocks them three days ago, on March 2, calls them grease spots on the highway, and yet Limbaugh is still getting attention for calling Sandra Fluke a slut.

Wow... just wow.

.

Friday, March 2, 2012

Limbaugh Called Fluke A Slut, Now It's A Big Deal: Did Obama Call Malkin Or Ingraham or Palin?

By Susan Duclos

[Update] Rush apologizes. Now will Fluke apologize for asking American taxpayers to pay $3,000 a year for her sexual habits?

Quite a bit if virtual ink is being dedicated to Rush Limbaugh, who evidently called Sandra Fluke a "slut", then doubled down and reiterated his position again today saying "I think this is hilarious. Absolutely hilarious. The left has been thrown into an outright conniption fit! This is "phony soldiers" times ten. Oh, ten times worse than phony soldiers. The reaction that they are having to what I said yesterday about Susan Fluke -- or Sandra Fluke, whatever her name is -- the Georgetown student who went before a congressional committee and said she's having so much sex, she's going broke buying contraceptives and wants us to buy them. I said, "Well, what would you call someone who wants us to pay for her to have sex? What would you call that woman? You'd call 'em a slut, a prostitute or whatever."

This is such a big deal that Barack Obama himself, the president, felt the need to call Ms. Fluke to find out of she was okay.

Here is my question: Did Obama call Sarah Palin to find out of she was okay when Obama supporters were posing with T-shirts saying "Sarah Palin is a cunt"?

Did the people that are so outraged now, dedicating all this virtual ink and time into expressing said outrage, dedicate the same type of virtual ink or outrage over the "Sarah Palin is a cunt" T-shirts?

Did Barack Obama call Laura Ingraham to see if she was okay when Ed Shultz called her a "right wing slut."

Did the people that are so outraged now, dedicate the same type of virtual ink or outrage over the "right wing slut" remark by Shultz?

Nope, some said Ingraham deserved it in their esteemed (snark) opinion.

Did Obama call Michelle Malkin to see if she was okay after Bill Maher said "She’d ‘Name Her Vibrator “Obama"

Did the liberals now howling in outrage stand up to defend Malkin? Nope, only conservatives seemed to step up for Malkin.

Let us compared the screen shots, shall we?

Maher's vibrator remark, Memeorandum screen shot from October 22, 2011, 6:20 PM:



Limbaugh's slut remark, Memeorandum screen shot(s) from March 2, 2012, 3:15 PM:





Compare that also to the reaction over Shultz's right wing slut remarks where we can count on one hand the amount of liberals that were outraged.

It took 2 1/2 screen captures to capture the discussion over Limbaugh's remarks, yet not even one full one over Maher's remarks and not even half a screen over Shultz's.

Gotta love Obama's and the left's double standards and hypocrisy huh?

[Update] Dan Riehl provides more Maher examples.

Less than a year ago, in March of 2011, Maher called Palin a “dumb tw*t,” as reported here by the Daily Caller. On March 29, 2011, the Caller also reported that Maher called Palin the “C-word.”


Did Obama call Palin then and ask if she was okay?

Did Liberals demand the Democrats to cut Maher out of their liberal cliche? No, in fact, Maher is a proud Obama supporter and has donated $1 million to his SuperPAC.

Liberal's manufactured outrage is a bit too late.