Showing posts with label internet. Show all posts
Showing posts with label internet. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Blacking out for SOPA...

I won't be blacking out this site in solidarity only because I don't have the technology to leave a marker telling people where I've gone for how long and why. So, instead I'm posting the following information from Wikipedia about why they're protesting the Stop On-line Piracy Act (SOPA) over the next 24 hours, and won't be posting anything else here for the next day out of respect for their blackout (and those of the 7000 other websites lining up with them). 
Be sure to contact your congressional representatives during the blackout (midnight 1/18 to midnight 1/19) from the link below and tell them you don't support SOPA, PIPA, or any such legislation

--------------from Wikipedia-----------

SOPA and PIPA - Learn more

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What effect is the blackout having, so far?
The purpose of the blackout is twofold: to raise awareness of SOPA and PIPA among the general public, and to encourage people to share their views with their representatives. It's too early to tell what the ultimate impact will be, but here are some early indicators, as of 1PM PT January 18:
Why is Wikipedia blacked-out?
Wikipedia is protesting against SOPA and PIPA by blacking out the English Wikipedia for 24 hours, beginning at midnight January 18, Eastern Time. Readers who come to English Wikipedia during the blackout will not be able to read the encyclopedia. Instead, you will see messages intended to raise awareness about SOPA and PIPA, encouraging you to share your views with your representatives, and with each other on social media.
What are SOPA and PIPA?
SOPA and PIPA represent two bills in the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate respectively. SOPA is short for the "Stop Online Piracy Act," and PIPA is an acronym for the "Protect IP Act." ("IP" stands for "intellectual property.") In short, these bills are efforts to stop copyright infringement committed by foreign web sites, but, in our opinion, they do so in a way that actually infringes free expression while harming the Internet. Detailed information about these bills can be found in the Stop Online Piracy Act and PROTECT IP Act articles on Wikipedia, which are available during the blackout. GovTrack lets you follow both bills through the legislative process: SOPA on this page, and PIPA on this one. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit organization dedicated to advocating for the public interest in the digital realm, has summarized why these bills are simply unacceptable in a world that values an open, secure, and free Internet.
Why is the blackout happening?
Wikipedians have chosen to black out the English Wikipedia for the first time ever, because we are concerned that SOPA and PIPA will severely inhibit people's access to online information. This is not a problem that will solely affect people in the United States: it will affect everyone around the world.
Why? SOPA and PIPA are badly drafted legislation that won't be effective at their stated goal (to stop copyright infringement), and will cause serious damage to the free and open Internet. They put the burden on website owners to police user-contributed material and call for the unnecessary blocking of entire sites. Small sites won't have sufficient resources to defend themselves. Big media companies may seek to cut off funding sources for their foreign competitors, even if copyright isn't being infringed. Foreign sites will be blacklisted, which means they won't show up in major search engines. And, SOPA and PIPA build a framework for future restrictions and suppression.
Does this mean that Wikipedia itself is violating copyright laws, or hosting pirated content?
No, not at all. Some supporters of SOPA and PIPA characterize everyone who opposes them as cavalier about copyright, but that is not accurate. Wikipedians are knowledgeable about copyright and vigilant in protecting against violations: Wikipedians spend thousands of hours every week reviewing and removing infringing content. We are careful about it because our mission is to share knowledge freely. To that end, all Wikipedians release their contributions under a free license, and all the material we offer is freely licensed. Free licenses are incompatible with copyright infringement, and so infringement is not tolerated.
Isn't SOPA dead? Wasn't the bill shelved, and didn't the White House declare that it won't sign anything that resembles the current bill?
No, neither SOPA nor PIPA is dead. On January 17th, SOPA's sponsor said the bill will be discussed in early February. There are signs PIPA may be debated on the Senate floor next week. Moreover, SOPA and PIPA are just indicators of a much broader problem. In many jurisdictions around the world, we're seeing the development of legislation that prioritizes overly-broad copyright enforcement laws, laws promoted by power players, over the preservation of individual civil liberties.
How could SOPA and PIPA hurt Wikipedia?
SOPA and PIPA are a threat to Wikipedia in many ways. For example, in its current form, SOPA would require Wikipedia to actively monitor every site we link to, to ensure it doesn't host infringing content. Any link to an infringing site could put us in jeopardy of being forced offline.
I live in the United States. What's the best way for me to help?
The most effective action you can take is to call your representatives and tell them you oppose SOPA and PIPA, and any similar legislation. Type your zipcode in the locator box to find your representatives' contact information. Text-based communication is okay, but phone calls have the most impact.
I don't live in the United States. How can I help?
Contact your local State Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, or similar branch of government. Tell them you oppose SOPA and PIPA, and any similar legislation. SOPA and PIPA will affect sites outside of the United States, and actions to sites inside the United States (like Wikipedia) will also affect non-American readers -- like you. Calling your own government will also let them know you don't want them to create their own bad anti-Internet legislation.
Is it still possible to access Wikipedia in any way?
Yes. During the blackout, Wikipedia is accessible on mobile devices and smart phones. You can also view Wikipedia normally by disabling JavaScript in your browser, as explained on this Technical FAQ page. Our purpose here isn't to make it completely impossible for people to read Wikipedia, and it's okay for you to circumvent the blackout. We just want to make sure you see our message.
I keep hearing that this is a fight between Hollywood and Silicon Valley. Is that true?
No. Some people are characterizing it that way, probably in an effort to imply all the participants are motivated by commercial self-interest. But it's obviously not that simple. The proof of that is Wikipedia's involvement. Wikipedia has no financial self-interest at play here: we do not benefit from copyright infringement, nor are we trying to monetize traffic or sell ads. We are protesting to raise awareness about SOPA and PIPA solely because we think they will hurt the Internet, and your ability to access information online. We are doing this for you, because we're on your side.
In carrying out this protest, is Wikipedia abandoning neutrality?
We hope you continue to trust Wikipedia to be a neutral information source. We are staging this blackout because (as Wikimedia Foundation Trustee Kat Walsh said recently), although Wikipedia’s articles are neutral, its existence is not. For over a decade, Wikipedians have spent millions of hours building the largest encyclopedia in human history. Wikipedia is a tremendously useful resource, and its existence depends upon a free, open and uncensored Internet. SOPA and PIPA (and other similar laws under discussion inside and outside the United States) will hurt you, because they will make it impossible for sites you enjoy, and benefit from, to continue to exist. That's why we're doing this.
I have a question that isn't answered here, or, I would like to send feedback to Wikipedia.
You can reach Wikipedia editors at info-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org. If you need a response, please be patient: we may have trouble keeping up with the mail.

What can I read to get more information?
Try these links:
As of 6AM PT, January 18, Google has more than 4,600 articles about the blackout. Here are a few:

United With The Protest Against SOPA/PIPA....



By Susan Duclos

Wake up America's main page will show support with the 7,000 plus sites blacking out on January 18, 2012, in protest against proposed legislation in the United States — the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the U.S. House of Representatives, and PROTECTIP (PIPA) in the U.S. Senate. This legislation, if passed, will harm the free and open Internet and bring about new tools for censorship of international websites inside the United States.

If you live in the United States, find your elected representative in Washington (https://www.eff.org/sopacall).

Blogger has not offered a plugin to blackout the whole site, so all posts written on January 18, 2012, until 8pm, will be shown on a separate page and this message will be the only one listed on the main page of the site.

Reddit has a comprehensive FAQ page on SOPA for those that have not been keeping up with the issue.

Related posts about this blackout:

SOPA Opponents Win A Victory As DNS Provision Pulled

List Of 60 Sites Joining The Reddit Blackout In Protest Of SOPA/PIPA

Site Statement: English Wikipedia to go dark January 18 in opposition to SOPA/PIPA

(This post will be bumped to the top, via time stamp changes of the page throughout the hours 8am-8pm throughout the day of January 18, 2012)

.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Site Statement: English Wikipedia to go dark January 18 in opposition to SOPA/PIPA

By Susan Duclos

Reports of Wikipedia going dark were added as an update to a different post with the list of sites going dark in protest of SOPA (House bill- Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Senate version- Protect IP Act). More on those lists here and information here).

The official notification, via Wikimedia, is out:

English Wikipedia to go dark January 18 in opposition to SOPA/PIPA

San Francisco -- January 16, 2012 -- On January 18, 2012, in an unprecedented decision, the Wikipedia community has chosen to blackout the English version of Wikipedia for 24 hours, in protest against proposed legislation in the United States — the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the U.S. House of Representatives, and PROTECTIP (PIPA) in the U.S. Senate. If passed, this legislation will harm the free and open Internet and bring about new tools for censorship of international websites inside the United States.

Wikipedia administrators confirmed this decision Monday afternoon (PST) in a public statement (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Action#Summary_and_conclusion):

Over the course of the past 72 hours, over 1800 Wikipedians have joined together to discuss proposed actions that the community might wish to take against SOPA and PIPA. This is by far the largest level of participation in a community discussion ever seen on Wikipedia, which illustrates the level of concern that Wikipedians feel about this proposed legislation. The overwhelming majority of participants support community action to encourage greater public action in response to these two bills. Of the proposals considered by Wikipedians, those that would result in a "blackout" of the English Wikipedia, in concert with similar blackouts on other websites opposed to SOPA and PIPA, received the strongest support.

“Today Wikipedians from around the world have spoken about their opposition to this destructive legislation," said Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia. "This is an extraordinary action for our community to take - and while we regret having to prevent the world from having access to Wikipedia for even a second, we simply cannot ignore the fact that SOPA and PIPA endanger free speech both in the United States and abroad, and set a frightening precedent of Internet censorship for the world."

We urge Wikipedia readers to make your voices heard. If you live in the United States, find your elected representative in Washington (https://www.eff.org/sopacall). If you live outside the United States, contact your State Department, Ministry of Foreign Affairs or similar branch of government. Tell them you oppose SOPA and PIPA, and want the internet to remain open and free.

About the Wikimedia Foundation
http://wikimediafoundation.org
http://blog.wikimedia.org

The Wikimedia Foundation is the non-profit organization that operates Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. According to comScore Media Metrix, Wikipedia and the other projects operated by the Wikimedia Foundation receive more than 474 million unique visitors per month, making them the fifth-most popular web property world-wide (comScore, November 2011). Available in 282 languages, Wikipedia contains more than 20 million articles contributed by a global volunteer community of more than 100,000 people. Based in San Francisco, California, the Wikimedia Foundation is an audited, 501(c)(3) charity that is funded primarily through donations and grants.

Media Contact:

For the Wikimedia Foundation

Jay Walsh
Head of Communications
Wikimedia Foundation
Tel. +1 415 839 6885 x 6609
jwalsh@wikimedia.org



Related:

SOPA protest: 7,000 and growing, say organizers.

(Headline updated)

Sunday, January 15, 2012

List Of 60 Sites Joining The Reddit Blackout In Protest Of SOPA/PIPA

By Susan Duclos

[UPDATE- 1/17/12] Official statement/notification, via Wiki.

[UPDATE- 1/17/12]SOPA protest: 7,000 and growing, say organizers. [End Update]

An estimated 7,000 websites are planning to go dark Wednesday as part of a mass protest against a pair of controversial anti-piracy bills — and opponents of the measures say the number is likely to increase.



[UPDATE]Link via email from contributor "auntybrat", Reports say Wikipedia is temporarily shutting down on Weds. January 18, 2012, in protest to SOPA and PIPA.

Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales says his online encyclopedia is temporarily shutting down. That's because of two bills in U.S. Congress right now, the Stop Online Piracy Act, or SOPA and the Protect IP Act, or PIPA.

The Hill confirms. [End Update]

With news that Harry Reid has decided to push the senate's version of SOPA (The Stop Online Piracy Act), known as PIPA (Protect IP Act), despite lawmakers backing away from the bills after an Internet uproar against both bills, and the White House's concerns, more websites have decided to join Reddit in their online protest where they will be blacking out their site for 12 hours in protest of the SOPA/PIPA bills.

This Internet blackout includes sites like Reddit, Boing Boing, and discussions are underway within sites the size of Wikipedia. Wordpress is even providing a special plugin for users who wish to participate in the "strike."

Reddit has a comprehensive FAQ page on SOPA for those that have not been keeping up with the issue.

Via Reddit blog:

We’ve seen some amazing activism organized by redditors at /r/sopa and across the reddit community at large. You have made a difference in this fight; and as we near the next stage, and after much thought, talking with experts, and hearing the overwhelming voices from the reddit community, we have decided that we will be blacking out reddit on January 18th from 8am–8pm EST (1300–0100 UTC).


Yahoo News provides more detail:

Instead of the normal reddit gumbo, visitors will be treated to a message about the impact of the PIPA/SOPA legislation on sites such as reddit. Along with the message will be links to resources for visitors to research the legislation. Reddit will also be showcasing a live video stream of “Internet entrepreneurs and technical experts” testifying at the House hearing. And for those of you looking for activist activities, like meetups or campaigns against PIPA/SOPA, reddit will be spotlighting these that day.


Stop SOPA strike list:

001. reddit: Announcement Link
002. Cheezburger Network: Announcement Link
003. Mojango / Minecraft: Announcement Link
004. XDA Developers: Announcement Link
005. Tucows: Announcement Link
006. Red5 Studios: Annoucement Link
007. Destructoid: Announcement Link
008. Droid Gamers Announcement Link
009. Major League Gaming Network: Announcement Link
010. Sixgun Productions: Announcement Link
011. Genesis Chess: Announcement Link
012. I hate Vodafone Egypt: Announcement Link
013: AnonOps Communications: Announcement Link
014: identi.ca: Announcement Link
015: Age of Coins: Announcement Link
016: CakeWrecks: Announcement Link
017: Rage Maker: Announcement Link
018: Sonic Retro: Announcement Link
019: The Linux Forum: Announcement Link
020: Talk Hosting: Announcement Link
021: Fish On Dry Land: Announcement Link
022: PoliticoINews: Announcement Link
023: Singley Mackey: Announcement Link
024: Theo Patt: Announcement Link
025: Bitacora del Boterran: Announcement Link
026: Boing Boing: Announcement Link
027: FalkVinge: Announcement Link (in the comments)
029: NBL Creations: Announcement Link
030: Sky Temple: Announcement Link
031: Game Generation: Announcement Link
032: Right Angle Recording: Announcement Link
033: Gaming Bus: Announcement Link
034: Harder Blogger Faster: Announcement Link
035: Colossal Mind: Announcement Link
036: Brent Anderson: Announcement Link
037: Working It Out: Announcement Link
038: Through the Eyes of a Pirate: Announcement Link
039: Cynical Brit: Announcement Link
040: Platform Nation: Announcement Link
041: Kahn Labs: Announcement Link
042: Jamacast: Announcement Link
043: Crypto Cat: Announcement Link
044: Gamer's Tube: Announcement Link
045: The Hippy Witch: Announcement Link
046: Boony's ART: Announcement Link
047: Radio Clash: Announcement Link
049: Electronic Rumor: Announcement Link
050: Razer: Announcement Link
051: GKick Network: Announcement Link
052: Revolutionary Politics: Announcement Link
053: Android Inssomnia: Announcement Link
054: Team Royal: Announcement Link
055: Back That Elf Up: Announcement Link
056: Talking about Games: Announcement Link
057: Seek My Beat: via comment on this post
058: Metroid Reorchestrated: Announcement Link
059: Raspberry Pi: Announcement Link
060: Jorja Fox Online: Announcement Link

Sopastrike.com has a partial list of sites joining in on the blackout.

NLB Creations has more names, some verified via their comment sections, others Twitter messages and some confirmed by the websites themselves.

.

Saturday, January 14, 2012

SOPA Opponents Win A Victory As DNS Provision Pulled

By Susan Duclos

Today's headlines, via CNet and Ars Technica, show that opponents of the SOPA (The Stop Online Piracy Act), have won part of their battle against the passage of the bill in the House of Representatives.

This comes a day after the Senate version of the bill named PIPA (Protect IP Act) was stripped on the DNS requirements as well.

There has been a massive movement to stop these bills, which are being referred to as an "Internet Censorship Bill" as well as an "Internet Blacklist Bill", from going forward and legislators from both the House and Senate are beginning to feel the blow-back locally from their own electorate and are now asking for a postponement of the Senate vote on PIPA to give lawmakers more time to "study" the bill.

Full Text of H.R.3261 -- Stop Online Piracy Act can be found HERE.

Reddit has a comprehensive FAQ page on SOPA for those that have not been keeping up with the issue.

The arguments being used by proponents and opponents of the bill are below:

What are some of the arguments for SOPA?

Proponents of the bill argue that jobs are threatened by rogue websites and copyright infringement and the bill is crucial to protecting key American industries.

“Rogue websites that steal and sell American innovations have operated with impunity. The online thieves who run these foreign websites are out of the reach of U.S. law enforcement agencies and profit from selling pirated goods without any legal consequences. According to estimates, IP theft costs the U.S. economy more than $100 billion annually and results in the loss of thousands of American jobs." Congressman Lamar Smith

The bill has broad support throughout the film and music industries, and those that rely on copyrights and trademarks including large corporations such as Mike, Viacom, Pfizer, and Ford. Several large unions and business organizations also support the bill, including the AFL-CIO, the Fraternal Order OF Police, the Chamber of Commerce, and the the Better Business Bureau.



What are some of the arguments against SOPA?

The language of the bill demonstrates a lack of understanding of the way the internet functions and disregards fundamental technological principles of the internet. It also contains ambiguous language that could lead to violations of the bill of rights and thus result in legal challenges. House SOPA Hearings Reveal Anti-internet Bias on Committee, Witness List

It has been called an internet blacklist bill that will grant the power to the US government to attempt to shutdown any website in the world once one US citizen has visited the site.

SOPA could have adverse consequences to internet security by forcing internet users to use private and foreign DNS servers. The functionality of the internet could be disrupted as users look for private DNS servers, and criminals would likely find ways to capitalize on the fracturing of the DNS hierarchy that has provided a basic level of security.

There is language in the bill that may result in attacks against open source software. The bill enables software vendors to go after sites that host software that can be used to enable piracy. This includes software such as:

VPN, proxy, privacy, or anonymization software--including SSH; software that works with zone files for generic top-level domains; or "client-side DNSSEC resolver that uses multiple servers until it finds a valid signed entry. Piracy Bill Could Waylay FLOSS Projects

The technical method of creating a blacklist with the domain name system is similar to the method that China uses to censor the internet with the Great Firewall of China. As the US government funds ongoing projects that are designed to allow internet users behind repressive firewalls such as China's to freely access the internet, then it is likely that those projects would need to be stopped or else the government would be in the position of funding projects that could enable American internet users to evade the restrictions imposed by SOPA.

Dr. Leonard Napolitano, the Director of the Sandia National Laboratories’ Center for Computer Sciences and Information Technologies released a letter reporting that SOPA and PIPA would fail to combat piracy and would negatively affect global internet security. Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) had this to say regarding the letter:

This analysis from one of our nation’s top cybersecurity experts is the definitive word that this legislation would undermine Internet security efforts and would harm the Internet. Dr. Napolitano and his team are tasked with securing our cyber infrastructure. Their assessment as experts at our national lab gives us the final answer as to whether these bills would endanger our security. They would.

Click here for a full copy of the Sandia Labs letter. [PDF]

The site-wide censorship of SOPA is overbroad and will have a negative impact on ordinary, non-infringing internet users, according to former Google attorney, Alec Macgillivray

A study of 200 venture capitalists found that more than 80% would be more willing to invest with the current internet regulations and a in a risky economy, than they would be in an improved economy with SOPA enacted. Angel Investors and Venture Capitalists Say They Will Stop Funding Some Internet Start-Up Business Models if Tough New Rules Are Enacted

SOPA and PIPA would place an unfair burden on small, user generated content sites such as TomsHardware.com



The Reddit FAQ page also provides a list of opponents as well as proponents for both the SOPA and PIPA bills.

.

Saturday, March 27, 2010

Bill of Rights

In Cyberspace



New Media pioneer (and former Masslive boss) Jeff Jarvis is suggesting that there be a "Bill of Rights" for cyberspace. Sounds pretty sensible to me, but I'm not sure this is complete. Still, it's a great place to begin the discussion and I love how he models it on the bill of rights in the American constitution.

A Bill of Rights in Cyberspace


I. We have the right to connect.

This is a preamble and precondition to the American First Amendment: before we can speak, we must be able to connect. Hillary Clinton defines the freedom to connect as “the idea that governments should not prevent people from connecting to the internet, to websites, or to each other.” It is this principle that also informs discussion of net neutrality.

II. We have the right to speak.

No one may abridge our freedom of speech. We acknowledge the limitations on freedom of speech but they must be defined as narrowly as possible, lest we find ourselves operating under a lowest common denominator of offense. Freedom is our default.

III. We have the right to speak in our languages.

The English language’s domination of the internet has faded as more languages and alphabets have joined the net, which is to be celebrated. But Ethan Zuckerman also cautions that in our polyglot internet, we will want to build bridges across languages. We will want to speak in our own languages but also speak with others’.

IV. We have the right to assemble.

In the American Bill of Rights, the right to assemble is listed separately from the right to speak. The internet enables us to organize without organizations and collaborate and that now threatens repressive regimes as much as speech.

V. We have the right to act.

These first articles are a thread: We connect to speak and speak to assemble and assemble to act and that is how we can and will change the world, not just putting forth grievances but creating the means to fix them. That is what threatens the institutions that would stop us.

VI. We have the right to control our data.

You should have access to data about you. And what’s yours is yours. We want the internet to operate on a principle of portability, so your information and creations cannot be held prisoner by a service or government and so you retain control. But keep in mind that when control is given to one, it is taken from another; in those details lurk devils. This principle thus speaks to copyright and its laws, which set the definitions and limits of control or creation. This principle also raises questions about whether the wisdom of the crowd belongs to the crowd.

VII. We have the right to our own identity.

This is not as simple as a name. Our identity online is made up of our names, addresses, speech, creations, actions, connections. Note also that in repressive regimes, maintaining anonymity — hiding one’s identity — is a necessity; thus anonymity, with all its faults and baggage and trolls, must also be protected online to protect the dissenter and the whistleblower. Note finally that these two articles — controlling our data and our identities — make up the right to privacy, which is really a matter of control.

VIII. What is public is a public good.

The internet is public; indeed, it is a public place (rather than a medium). In the rush to protect privacy, we must beware the dangers of restricting the definition of public. What’s public is owned by the public. Making the public private or secret serves the corrupt and tyrannical.

IX. The internet shall be built and operated openly.

The internet must continue to be built and operated to open standards. It must not be taken over or controlled by any company or government. It must not be taxed. It is the internet’s openness that gives it its freedom. It is this freedom that defines the internet.

On the Bench

Yesteday at dusk I was sitting on this bench in the Coolidge Courtyard in downtown Northampton while waiting for a friend.



This is what I saw if I looked to my left.



This is what I saw if I looked straight ahead.



This is what I saw if I looked to my right.



Later we went and grooved to art at the Michelman Gallery.



The view out the gallery window.



Gatherings

East Longmeadow Selectman Jack Villamaino (center) marching with GOP gubernatorial candidate Charlie Baker and Holyoke City Councilor Kevin Jourdain in the Holyoke St. Patrick's Day Parade.



Longtime activist Victor Davila is apparently the new president of the Springfield Republican City Committee.



At UMass it looks like an interesting new club is forming.


Reject Normaltivity!


The Music Section

Long live nerd rock.



Recently Jordan Williams posted about his visit to Slab City, the self-proclaimed "last free place in America." It turns out they even have their own theme song.


Monday, June 15, 2009

Twitter Revolution

A Force for Liberty

It's amazing to watch the videos pouring out of Iran this weekend of the massive demonstrations and rioting over the rigged presidential election. Notice how this video is set to a pretty good Iranian rap tune.



The weakness of President Jimmy Carter caused a monstrous religious dictatorship to arise in Iran, and we can only hope that now it is finally going to be overthrown. Despite all attempts by Iran to suppress outside reporting of the unrest, no government controls YouTube or Blogger.com or the internet itself, so the dictators of the world can on longer impose a wall of silence behind which they do their evil deeds. The internet helps to ensure free speech, so no oppressive regime can long endure because the internet is a medium that transends all political control. That is why it is the most revolutionary political tool ever devised - and since people never choose to be oppressed, it works only for the cause of liberty.

Newsy Videos

Here are two videos worth watching dealing with recebt events. Here's the first interview with the brave young patriot Ian Barry, who smoked pot in front of his entire high school.



Hadley had a big parade this weekend for its 350th birthday. Amherst writer Mary Carey took this video of a truck called the Hatfield Hellion doing tricks in the middle of Route Nine.



The Challenger

Mike Franco sends along this photo of Northampton's Dr. Jay Fleitman speaking at a Flag Day event in Belchertown. Fleitman is challenging incumbent Congressman Richard Neal in 2010.



By all accounts the Doctor came across as very impressive.

Land of the Lost

Yesterday I was cutting across Amherst College when I noticed some filming going on of some kids dressed as detectives.



Of course I had to check it out. Turns out they were PBS cameramen filming for a future episode of Fetch! Here's the cartoon host and the actors.




I'm completely out of touch with kid-TV, but I'm told there are young fans who would kill to meet those child stars, whose names I don't even know.

The filming was going on in front of Amherst College's new Natural History Museum. Since it was open and free of charge, I decided to pop in, although I've visited many times including back when it was in its funky old location. It's full of ancient bones of extinct creatures.



Good grief, this place has more skeletons than a politician's closet.



With skulls the size of Volkswagons, Tyranasaurus Rex and a Triceratops are displayed side by side.



In real life the only way those two monsters would have gotten that close together was if they were engaged in a battle to the death.

The real gems of the collection however are these dinosaur tracks discovered right here in the Pioneer Valley, most of them in the Hadley area. How strange to think that dinosaurs once walked where humans now roam through malls.



Those footprints are the oldest known artifacts of local history. If you are a Pioneer Valley history buff, that room is the holy grail - you can't go back any further.

Here is a giant painting of our Valley with a display of the various types of stones to be found beneath our feet.



Nostalgic Visit

Darth Vader guards the porch of this Fearing Street partyhouse in Amherst.



Nearby is this house where I used to attend parties when I was a UMass student. I think it was a frathouse in my day.



Anyway, a friend of mine has the job of cleaning it out now that the students have left for the summer, and he let me come in for a few minutes and poke around. I was pleased to see that it hasn't changed much, and the old antique fireplace is still more or less intact.



Some of the students moved out leaving their wall posters behind, as you can see from this photo of a UMass party animal, now retired.



Springfield Dead

Someone sent me this pic of drummer Bill Kreutzmann mixing with the crowd before a Grateful Dead concert in Springfield.



Today's Video

Amherst's Dinosaur Jr. has a new album coming out June 23 called "Farm." Here's the video of the first single, and it sounds like it has real hit potential. It's a song telling you to do whatever you want to do no matter how old you are and to ignore the evil assholes who tell you to conform to the so-called "proper" ways to behave. Greg Saulmon dug up this quote from the video's director: "At what point are you supposed to be over doing stuff that you enjoy-- like skating or playing ear-splitting music -- just because society says it's uncool to do it? My answer: Never."

A tune after my own heart.


The best sermons are lived, not preached.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Beyond Privacy

The Transparent Life



People are always saying to me something to the effect, "I can't believe how much of yourself you reveal online." I always reply to them that they are mistaken, "You should see the stuff I don't write about!" I can tell by their expressions that they have a hard time imagining what remains hidden in the world of a queer, former drug addict who listens to the Grateful Dead while promoting anarchistic libertarian politics.

I often describe this blog as a prototype for online life as it will be lived in the future, when the millions of young Americans who have been chronicling their lives since they were children enter adulthood and beyond. That will be a world of minimal privacy, at least as we currently understand the term, but Jeff Jarvis tells us in his new book that privacy is overrated anyway.



But still, I hear, hasn’t life become too public? What has become of privacy? “Nothing you do ever goes away and nothing you do ever escapes notice,” Vint Cerf, one of the fathers of the internet and most recently a Google executive, told an audience in Seattle. Then he added—please note, with irony—“There isn’t any privacy, get over it.” He’s right. I say privacy is one of the most overused fear words of the age. Privacy is not the issue. Control is. We need control of our personal information, whether it is made public and to whom, and how it is used. That is our right, at least for matters outside the public sphere.

The ethics and expectations of privacy have changed radically in Generation G. People my age and older fret at all the information young people make public about themselves. I try to explain that this sharing of personal information is a social act. It forms the basis of the connections Google makes possible. When we reveal something of ourselves publicly, we have tagged ourselves in such a way that we can be searched and found under that description. As I said in the chapter on health, I now can be found in a search for my heart condition, afib. That is how others came to me and how we shared information. Publicness brings me personal benefits that outweigh the risks.

Publicness also brings us collective benefits, as should be made clear by now from the aggregated wisdom Google gathers and shares back with us thanks to our public actions: our searches, clicks, links, and creations. Publicness is a community asset. The crowd owns the wisdom of the crowd and to withhold information from that collective knowledge—a link, a restaurant rating, a bit of advice—may be a new definition of antisocial or at least selfish behavior.

For all these reasons and one more powerful than any of them—ego—we will continue to reveal more of ourselves online. We will want to speak and to be discovered. Our online shadows become our identities. To stand out from our crowd, we need distinct identities. I’ll bet we’ll soon see parents giving children unique names so they can stand alone in Google searches. Wired editor Chris Anderson linked to an early indication of the trend: Laura Wattenberg, author of The Baby Name Wizard, reported that in the 1950s, a quarter of all children got one of the top 10 baby names; more recently that has fallen to a tenth. I was about to predict that someday soon, parents would check to assure the .com domain for a name is available before giving the moniker to a baby. Then I searched on Google and, sure enough, the Associated Press reported in 2007 that it’s already happening: “In fact, before naming his child, Mark Pankow checked to make sure ‘BennettPankow.com’ hadn’t already been claimed. ‘One of the criteria was, if we liked the name, the domain had to be available,’ Pankow said.” At last check, young Bennett wasn’t blogging, but his digital destiny is set.




Blog Party

Google, owner of Blogger.com, held a party for some of their top talent at the SXSW music and media conference (my invitation must have gotten lost in the mail). Anyway, they seem to know what their guests want to do.



Different is Good

The radio station that calls itself The River has a new company car. Pretty cool.



Did Elvis come in that car? The spirit of Mr. Presley was conjured up this morning in front of the Northampton courthouse by Lord Russ of Aloha Steamtrain etc. etc. doing his Elvis shtick. That's in contrast to the demented Elvis shtick he did last year (below) at the gay pride parade. (Bill Dwight photo)



This was the straight Elvis, and I must admit he's good. The majestic front steps of the courthouse did indeed seem like an entrance fit for a king.



He had some witty Elvis banter between songs, such as, "Nice to be here at the courthouse, maybe my pharmacist is on trial inside!"



Well at least Elvis has a sense of humor about his sordid side.

Today's Video

A scene re-enacted in bedrooms all across America.