Saturday, March 17, 2012
The Trayvon Martin case.The MSM is finally noticing.
He looked like he might be on drugs and “up to no good.”
“It’s raining. He’s just walking around, looking about,” Zimmerman told the dispatcher. “He’s just staring looking at all the houses.”
Later, he lamented: “These a**holes always get away.”
Zimmerman is the neighborhood watch volunteer in the Central Florida town of Sanford who on Feb. 26 shot and killed Miami Gardens teenager Trayvon Martin. Zimmerman claimed the teen started an altercation, and then -- in fear for his life -- Zimmerman pulled a weapon from his waistband and fired. He has not been charged.
Family members and attorneys believe the Sanford Police has bent over backward to protect Zimmerman out of a sense of kinship for a man who had devoted his spare time to law enforcement.
In an interview this week with the Miami Herald, Police Chief Bill Lee said the 911 calls would prove the incident was not a case of racial profiling, because when asked whether the suspect was white or black, Zimmerman did not know. However the recording clearly shows that when asked, Zimmerman said, “He looks black.” And then a few moments later, “He’s a black male.”
His family filed a lawsuit to force the Sanford Police Department to release the 911 tapes to clarify the murky circumstances. A hearing had been scheduled for Monday, and in the face of mounting national pressure the Sanford Police decided to release the tapes late Friday. They first allowed the slain teen’s family and attorneys to listen.
According to the recordings posted on the city’s website, Zimmerman was perturbed because Trayvon looked a bit out of sorts. Other callers reported hearing someone calling for help and then a blast that silenced the wailing. One call, so close that the cries for help could be heard, contains two sounds, first a muted bang that family attorneys believe was a warning shot, then the louder crack of close-range gunfire. Sanford police said Sunday that a check of the weapon showed only one shot was fired.
The first call came from Zimmerman.
“He’s just looking at all the houses,” Zimmerman said. “Now he’s just staring at me.” Then Zimmerman said the suspicious person, who appeared to be black and in his late teens, had his hand in his waist band. “Something’s wrong with him. He’s coming to check me out.”
As he narrates where the man was headed, the dispatcher asks, “are you following him?” Yeah,” Zimmerman said. “We don’t need you to do that.” [Source]
"These a**holes always get away". Yes they do. But they might not this time Mr. Zimmerman.
Glad to see that the main stream media like NBC (they waited until the weekend) and CNN have finally caught up to this story. It always takes them awhile (they have to check out the sensibilities of their audience, first ), but eventually they catch up to the rest of us.
The thing is, the media in A-merry-ca will jump all over a story where there is perceived injustice somewhere else in the world, but not so much here in A-merry-ca. They are especially afraid of stories that involve the uncomfortable subject of race. God forbid we mess up the beautiful kumbaya post-racial vibe that we have been enjoying of late. *sarcasm off*
At the end of the day it's bloggers and the social media that always drives these stories,because the producers who work in the main stream media and their puppet masters do not have the guts to do it. It's only after the public outcry becomes loud enough to embarrass them that they give in and feature these types of stories in their programming.
Troy Davis, the Scott Sisters, Jena, and on and on it goes.
But hey, that's why we are here; because CNN doesn't always cover our world.
Friday, March 9, 2012
Soledad O'Brien Proves Breitbart's Point
In an example of complete journalistic bias and a total lack of even the pretense of being objective, Soledad O'Brien proves the point that the late Andrew Breitbart made throughout his career and which his editors and staff continue to make so spectacularly.
Below is a video of Soledad O'Brien denying the news worthiness of the Obama Derrick Bell critical race theory bruhaha and beneath that is Rush Limbaugh pointing out that her reaction is exactly the whole point. O'Brien's reaction as well proves the media bias that Breitbart proved time and time again over the years.
In answer to O'Brien's question below: "YOUR reaction is the bombshell."
Rush says:
That's what she thinks. Any professor at Harvard is "distinguished" by definition. All you have to do is be there and you're distinguished. All you have to do is be at Harvard or Yale, Princeton, and you are "distinguished." There's no changing her mind on that. Those guys in the video made the right observation. (paraphrased exchange) You know, she's saying, "I don't know what you guys are doing. I don't see any big news here. I don't see where the blockbuster." And they said, "That's the blockbuster! The blockbuster is that you don't see anything here that is of any note. The blockbuster is you're not interested in finding out who Barack Obama is, and that's the only point we're trying to make. And thank you, Ms. O'Brien, for making it for us."
More on O'Brien's comments and how Wikipedia's critical race theory page have been edited 26 times yesterday alone including the removal of the phrase "White Supremacy".
[Update] To the argument itself about Critical Race Theory, JustOneMinute activates the search engine and stops at "Pollak 6, O'Brien 0."
Tom Maguire concludes:
So her statement about critical race theory - “There is no white supremacy in that" - is either woefully misinformed or a lie. And since she has claimed to be re-reading a book by Derrick Bell, I think she knows darn well she is lying.
Read the whole thing.
[Update] Link to GregLewis.org who has an excellent piece on this issue.
Related:
Video: CNN beclowns itself painting Breitbart editor-in-chief as racist (Hint- Pollak's wife isn't white)
.
Monday, February 6, 2012
Brent Bozell Takes Network News Chiefs To Task For Not Covering Obama's War On Religion
The following letter by MRC President Brent Bozell, was sent out to the presidents of the news divisions of ABC, CBS and NBC, and to the President of CNN, taking the to task for their slow coverage on Barack Obama's direct attack on religion freedom in what is being hailed as Obama's War On Religion.
The broadcast and cable television networks need to report the current, unprecedented assault against freedom of religion in this country, as well as the millions of Americans who would be left out in the cold by the Obama administration if it does not rescind HHS’s recently issued insurance mandate requiring contraceptive coverage. As our statistics and analysis below outline, they are not, and it’s a glaring double standard.
First, allow us to offer perspective on whom this new mandate affects. There are more than 65 million Catholics in the United States. Collectively, they operate more than 7,000 Catholic schools to educate children of all faiths and backgrounds. They also manage hundreds of health care facilities. In fact, one in six patients in the United States is cared for in a Catholic hospital.
All of these institutions and countless other Catholic-run charities will be forced to close their doors – or forfeit their most fundamental and deeply held religious beliefs if the Obama administration’s new mandate is not rescinded. The mandate forces these religious institutions to provide insurance covering sterilizations, abortion-causing drugs and artificial contraceptives, all of which fly in the face of Catholic teaching.
Yet to date, the broadcast networks have nearly ignored it. In contrast, in reaction to a decision that would affect vastly fewer potential patients, the networks pounced on the Susan G. Komen Foundation's decision (now overturned) to cease a measly $480,000 in a grant to Planned Parenthood, the country's largest abortion provider.
Since the mandate was finalized on January 20, 2012:
• ABC and NBC waited 16 days to cover the anti-Catholic ruling, finally citing the new rule on “This Week” and “Meet the Press” on February 5.
• CBS waited 10 days to mention it on “This Morning” and provided no subsequent coverage.
• CNN briefly mentioned the rule when it was announced on January 20th, then didn’t bother to mention it again for 10 days.
That stands in sharp contrast to the decision of the private Komen Foundation, when these same networks almost instantly piled on with publicity that helped fill Planned Parenthood's coffers and added to the pressure that forced Komen to reverse.
In fact, as of February 5th, ABC, CBS and NBC covered the Komen controversy six times more than the anti-Catholic HHS law.
New York Archbishop Timothy Dolan has said this new law “is as much an attack on access to health care as on religious freedom” and bishops across the country have issued the strongest letters in memory condemning this assault on religious liberty. Indeed, non-Catholic institutions across the country have joined the Catholic Church in condemning the administration, so you have no lack of experts and interviewees to discuss this outrage on-air.
The double standard is clear for all to see. You are ignoring the attack on the freedom of religion by the Obama administration, but coming to the aid of Planned Parenthood because you agree with them.
Your network must cover the administration’s insurance mandate accurately and comprehensively for what it is – an unprecedented assault against religion and a devastating blow to the millions of American school children, sick, elderly and poor of all religious faiths that are served by these Catholic institutions. If you refuse, and limit your networks to reporting about the Komen Foundation’s decision to pull funding from Planned Parenthood, then you cannot be seen as anything but an anti-Catholic, pro-abortion advocate.
Report both sides.
Sincerely,
L. Brent Bozell III
Founder and President
The Media Research Center
cc: Most Reverend Charles J. Chaput, O.F.M. Cap., D.D.; Most Reverend Timothy Dolan, President, Catholic Conference of Bishops; Mr. Bryan Wright, President Southern Baptist Convention; Bishop Larry Goodpaster, The United Methodist Church; Dr. Julius Scruggs, President, National Baptist Convention, USA; Mr. Mark Hanson, Presiding Bishop Evangelical Lutheran Church in America; Dr. George Wood Chief Executive Officer Assemblies of God; Dr. Jeff Farmer, Chairperson, Pentecostal/Charismatic Churches of North America; Dr. Richard Land, President, Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission; Carl A. Anderson, Supreme Knight – Knights of Columbus
Online contact page for ABC News found HERE.
Online contact page for NBC News found HERE.
Online contact page for CBS News found HERE.
Online contact page for CNN found HERE.
.
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Video:Gingrich Rips CNN's John King For First Question Of Debate, RE: Gingrich's Ex Wife's Allegations
Will link to the entire transcript of the debate in the morning, [Update- Link HERE] but the debate started out unexpectedly with John King asking Newt Gingrich the first question of the debate, at approximately 2:24 minutes into the video below, where King focuses on the personal allegations made by Gingrich's former wife.
Not only does Gingrich tear into King but he manages to get another standing ovation from the South Carolina audience.
More on the debate tomorrow.
.
